Research Notes

Research Notes contain work in progress: a question being clarified, evidence being reviewed, a field observation being documented, a design assumption being examined, or an interpretation being revised.

They are not automatically scientific papers and are not assumed to be peer reviewed. A strong note should make its status, evidence level, alternative explanations, and uncertainty visible.

Each note remains canonical here because Research Note describes its epistemic and editorial status. Project and subject indexes provide additional discovery without moving or duplicating the page.

Building, Product Design & Learning Technology

These notes are also discoverable in All Writing and, when connected to the project, Vocora Publications & Notes.

Human Learning, Leadership & Transformation

These notes are also collected in Research Publications.

Common Note Types

Open Question

A concise statement of an active question, why it matters, what is currently known, and what would be a useful next step.

Field Note

A structured account of a real setting such as a class, coaching relationship, organization, facilitated group, or product. It must distinguish direct observation, participant self-report, and the author’s interpretation.

Literature Review

A review of published evidence that identifies the population, task, comparison, outcome, limitations, and the distance between the source finding and the current practical setting.

Design Note

A record of a project or program decision, the assumptions behind it, alternatives considered, and how the decision could be evaluated.

  1. Question and status
  2. Why it matters
  3. Setting, source, or material reviewed
  4. Direct observation or published evidence
  5. Participant self-report, when applicable
  6. Current interpretation
  7. Alternative explanations
  8. Implications for practice or a project
  9. Limitations, privacy, and uncertainty
  10. Open questions and next step
  11. References

Table of contents